Commitment Issues Test: See Whether You Avoid, Waver or Fear Commitment, and Why
This commitment issues test looks at what happens when a relationship asks you to decide: whether you dodge the question, keep one foot out the door, or feel panic at the milestones. Eighteen original statements, an instant result, and a breakdown that separates avoidance, ambivalence and fear, because they need different answers.
Reviewed byMichael Callans, MSWCommitment Issues Test is a free, confidential 18-question self-assessment, original educational screener · informed by commitment research. It takes about 5 minutes, runs entirely in your browser, and gives you a plain-language score across 3 interpretation bands plus an optional in-depth report. It is an educational screening, not a diagnosis.
What happens when a relationship asks you to decide
Commitment issues are not one thing. Some people avoid the conversation and keep their options open. Some are stuck in doubt, never sure this is the right person. Some want to commit and are frightened of what it will cost them. This screening asks eighteen plain questions about how you behave at the moments that call for a decision, then shows which of the three is doing most of the work. It is a reflection tool for adults, not a diagnosis.
Eighteen moments of decision
Each statement names a specific situation: being asked what you are, a partner suggesting you move in, a milestone a year out, a dating app you have not deleted. Two statements run the other way and are reverse-scored, so the total cannot be inflated by agreeing with everything.
Three reasons, scored separately
Avoidance (dodging the label, keeping options open), ambivalence (never sure this is the one) and fear (of lost freedom, of being hurt) each get their own score. Most quizzes tell you that you have commitment issues; this one shows which kind.
Built on commitment research, honestly labeled
The items are informed by the investment model of commitment and by work on dedication versus constraint, but they are original and the bands are educational, not clinical cutoffs. The result ends with what to do next, not a label.
| Feature | Typical free quiz | Psychology.com |
|---|---|---|
| Separates avoidance, ambivalence and fear | One blended score | Three scores plus a total |
| Asks about concrete moments, not abstract traits | Rarely | Yes, every item is a situation |
| Informed by commitment research | Rarely | Investment model and dedication research cited |
| Reverse-keyed items against yes-saying | Rarely | Yes, two items |
| Clinician-reviewed interpretation | Rarely | Yes, clinician reviewed |
| Optional in-depth personalized report | No | Yes, written to your exact scores |
| Answers stay on your device | Often collected | Scored in your browser; only summary scores if you request a PDF or report |
Therapists Who Work With Relationship issues
If your result points to something you want help with, these licensed therapists work with it. Every member is matched to the federal NPI Registry; board checks are dated on the profile.
-
View profile
Abbey PopeLCPC, MS
License verified, checked Oct 13, 2026
“I offer affirming, empowering, evidence-based therapy.”
Lawrence, Kansas Telehealth and in person $140 to $160 per session
-
View profile
License verified, checked Oct 16, 2026
“Helping college students, young adults, teens, children and their families navigate life's toughest transitions to make living happier.”
Jacksonville, Florida Telehealth and in person $185 per session, sliding scale
-
View profile
Adria HaggLCSW, MSW
License verified, checked Sep 30, 2026
“I think of my therapy practice as a place for people to come to experience peace, safety, understanding and self reflection.”
Ann Arbor, Michigan Telehealth $185 per session
How scoring works
Answers are scored 0–72 in total. Your result falls into one of 3 bands:
| Score | Band | What it suggests |
|---|---|---|
| 0–23 | Few commitment issues | Your answers suggest that when a relationship asks you to decide, you mostly can. You answer the question, make the plan, and picture a future without feeling trapped. |
| 24–47 | Moderate commitment issues | Your answers suggest commitment is something you want and also something you keep at arm's length. You get close, and then you keep one foot near the door. |
| 48–72 | Significant commitment issues | Your answers suggest that deciding to stay feels very hard for you, across avoidance, doubt and fear. That is a heavy pattern to live with, and it is a learned one, which means it can change. |
How the commitment issues test is scored
Each of the eighteen statements is rated from strongly disagree (0) to strongly agree (4), for a total from 0 to 72. Two statements describe comfort with commitment, such as picturing a long-term future without feeling trapped, and are reverse-scored, so higher always means more commitment difficulty. The statements fall into three groups of six. Avoidance covers the behaviors: not answering the what-are-we question, keeping apps alive, relationships that end just before they get serious. Ambivalence covers the doubt: wondering whether someone better exists, going back and forth, losing interest once things feel secure. Fear covers the reasons: losing freedom, losing yourself, being hurt again.
The three bands divide the range into rough thirds. They are educational ranges for an original questionnaire, not clinical cutoffs, and the three groups are our own, not validated subscales. Read the breakdown alongside the total, because the same moderate score can mean an avoider who is quite sure of their partner or a devoted partner who is quietly terrified.
What commitment issues are, and what they are not
Relationship research describes commitment as the intention to stay and build a future with someone, and it tends to grow from satisfaction, from investment, and from having fewer appealing alternatives. Commitment issues show up when that intention will not form even though the relationship is good. Scott Stanley's work separates dedication, the wanting-to, from constraint, the hard-to-leave. People with commitment issues often have plenty of constraint and little dedication, which is why they stay for years without ever choosing.
Commitment issues are not the same as being single by choice, taking your time, or correctly leaving a relationship that is wrong for you. Not wanting to commit to one particular person can be good judgment. The pattern becomes an issue when it repeats across partners you genuinely liked, when it is driven by panic rather than information, or when you keep a relationship undefined for so long that the other person is hurt. None of this is a diagnosis.
Patterns that often sit underneath
Avoidance of commitment is frequently an attachment story. People with an avoidant style learned that depending on someone was risky, so distance feels like safety; people with an anxious style sometimes commit fast and then panic. The Attachment Style Quiz can show which fits. If the real block is closeness itself rather than the decision, the Fear of Intimacy Test looks at that directly. Chronic ambivalence can also come from falling in love quickly and repeatedly, which the Emophilia Test: Do You Fall in Love Too Fast? test screens. If you are single and wondering whether this pattern is part of why, the Why Am I Single? Quiz looks at the common reasons. And if you want to know whether you are in a place to commit to anyone right now, the Am I Ready for a Relationship? Quiz asks that straight.
What to do with your result
Start by naming which of the three is highest, because they call for different moves. Avoidance responds to small, chosen commitments: say yes to the plan three months out, delete the app you are not using, answer the what-are-we question with a real answer even if the answer is I am not sure yet. Ambivalence responds to deciding what good enough looks like before you judge a partner against it, and to noticing whether doubt spikes exactly when things get secure. Fear responds to being specific: what do you expect to lose, and has that actually happened in a committed relationship you have seen up close?
If the pattern has ended relationships you wanted, or your partner is waiting on a decision you cannot make, a therapist who works with relationships can help you understand what commitment means to you and practice it in steps. Deciding deliberately, rather than sliding into or out of things, is associated in research with better relationship quality.
Methodology & sources
The eighteen statements are original, written for this page and informed by commitment research: the investment model, which describes commitment as growing from satisfaction, investment and the quality of alternatives (Rusbult, Martz and Agnew, 1998); the distinction between dedication and constraint commitment (Stanley and Markman, 1992); and research on sliding versus deciding through relationship transitions (Owen, Rhoades and Stanley, 2013). No items from the Investment Model Scale or the Commitment Inventory are reproduced. Each statement is rated on a five-point agreement scale scored 0 to 4; two items are reverse-scored, and the total runs 0 to 72, higher meaning more commitment difficulty. The breakdown into avoidance, ambivalence and fear is our own grouping for reflection, not a validated subscale structure.
The three bands split the range into rough thirds and are educational ranges, not clinical cutoffs. The research cited supports the ideas behind the items but does not validate this questionnaire or its bands. The test is for adults, for education and self-reflection; it cannot identify a disorder, and a high score describes a pattern in how you have been handling commitment, not a fixed trait or a judgment of you.
References
- Rusbult CE, Martz JM, Agnew CR. The Investment Model Scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships. 1998;5(4):357-387. doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
- Stanley SM, Markman HJ. Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1992;54(3):595-608. doi.org/10.2307/353245
- Owen J, Rhoades GK, Stanley SM. Sliding versus deciding in relationships: associations with relationship quality, commitment, and infidelity. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2013;12(2):135-149. doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.779097
- Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(3):511-524. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3572722/
Cite this source
Psychology.com. (2026, October 20). Commitment Issues Test. Psychology.com. https://psychology.com/tests/commitment-issues
Commitment Issues Test FAQ
What are commitment issues, in plain terms?
A repeating difficulty forming the intention to stay and build a future with a partner, even when the relationship is good. It shows up as dodging the what-are-we conversation, keeping options open, panic at milestones, or a string of relationships that end just before they get serious. The reasons differ from person to person, which is why this test scores avoidance, ambivalence and fear separately.
Is this test about me or about my partner?
About you. Every statement asks how you behave and feel when a relationship asks for a decision. If you are trying to understand a partner who will not commit, you can read the bands for insight, but please do not take the test on their behalf or treat the result as a verdict on them.
Are commitment issues the same as avoidant attachment?
They overlap but are not identical. Avoidant attachment is one common root, and our attachment style quiz can show whether it fits. But people with anxious attachment can also struggle to commit, usually through ambivalence, and some commitment difficulty is simply fear of repeating a painful past. The breakdown is there to tell those apart.
Can I have commitment issues and still want a relationship?
Yes, and that is the most common pattern. Wanting a partner and freezing when it is time to decide are not contradictory. Fear of what commitment costs, or of being hurt, can sit right next to a genuine wish for a shared life. If closeness itself is what sets off the alarm, the fear of intimacy test looks at that specifically.
Is it a disorder?
No. There is no diagnosis called commitment issues, and this screening cannot identify any condition. It describes a pattern. Where it has caused real distress or repeatedly ended relationships you wanted, a therapist who works with relationships can help, but that is support for a pattern, not treatment of a disorder.
Is the test really confidential?
Yes. It runs entirely in your browser. Your individual answers are scored in your browser and are never sent to us or linked to you. They stay in this tab so you can return to your result, and closing or clearing the tab clears them. If you ask us to email the PDF, we receive your summary scores with your email address, never your individual answers. No account is needed.
Related tests
Results in this topic, explained in full
Each named result from the tests in this topic has its own in-depth, clinician-reviewed profile: what it means, strengths and blind spots, and what the research says.