Existential Therapy: The Four Givens and How Sessions Work

About this tool

Existential therapy is less a single treatment protocol than a stance a therapist takes. It starts from the view that a good deal of human distress is not a disorder but a response to facts that come with being alive, and that the work is to face those facts rather than smooth them over. Its most widely used map comes from the American psychiatrist Irvin Yalom, whose 1980 book Existential Psychotherapy set out four ultimate concerns: death, freedom, isolation and meaninglessness. Anxiety, in this reading, is often the sound of one of them pressing on a life.

The approach grew out of European philosophy rather than out of a laboratory. Kierkegaard wrote about dread and choice, Nietzsche about creating value without inherited certainty, Heidegger about being toward death, Sartre about the responsibility that freedom carries. Psychiatrists including Karl Jaspers, Ludwig Binswanger and Medard Boss turned those ideas into a way of seeing patients. Rollo May and his co-editors brought the tradition to English-speaking clinicians with the 1958 collection Existence. Viktor Frankl's logotherapy, covered on Logotherapy, is the meaning-centered branch, and Emmy van Deurzen and Mick Cooper have led the British school since the 1980s.

Death is the first given, and Yalom treated it as the engine behind a great deal of ordinary anxiety. Not the fear of dying tomorrow, but the background knowledge that you will, which can surface as panic in the small hours, as health worry, as a frantic pace, or as a numbness that keeps the thought at arm's length. His clinical position was that confronting the fact tends to loosen its grip, and that people who do so often report living with more attention rather than less. If this is the given that brought you here, Death Anxiety Test (Thanatophobia) offers a self-assessment and Fear of Death (Thanatophobia) covers the phobia specifically.

Freedom is the given people expect least. It does not mean political liberty; it means that there is no built-in design to a life, which leaves you as the author of it whether you want the job or not. That is where responsibility comes from, and also the dizziness that can come with a real choice: a career you could leave, a relationship you are choosing daily, a value nobody handed you. In therapy this shows up as indecision, as waiting for permission, as blaming circumstance for a choice already made, and as the particular paralysis of having too many acceptable options.

Isolation in this framework is not loneliness and cannot be fixed by company. It is the fact that nobody else is inside your experience, that the most loving relationship still has two separate people in it, and that you will meet your own death alone. Yalom argued that much of what goes wrong in relationships comes from asking another person to abolish that gap: fusing, losing your own outline, staying in something poor rather than being alone, or using sex or constant contact to paper it over. The therapeutic aim is a relationship that holds the gap rather than denying it.

Meaninglessness is the fourth. If there is no built-in purpose, then meaning has to be made, and the feeling that it has not been made is its own kind of distress: work that pays and bores, days that pass without being chosen, a success that arrived and changed nothing. Frankl called the hollow version the existential vacuum. Yalom's answer, borrowed partly from the idea of engagement, was that meaning is not solved by thinking harder but found by committing to something, and that a therapist's job is often to remove the obstacles to engagement rather than to supply a purpose.

A session tends to surprise people who expect worksheets. There is no fixed protocol, no symptom checklist to work down, often no homework. The therapist works with what is happening between the two of you in the room, on the view that how you relate there is how you relate elsewhere, and will ask direct questions most people avoid: what are you not saying, what are you choosing by not choosing, what would you regret. Therapists in this tradition tend to be transparent about their own humanity and mortality. Length varies widely, from a dozen sessions to open-ended work.

On evidence, the fair summary is that parts of the family have support and the rest is thin. The 2015 meta-analysis by Joel Vos, Megan Craig and Mick Cooper identified 21 eligible randomized trials of existential therapies and pooled the 15 with unique data, covering 1,792 participants. Structured meaning-centered interventions, six studies, showed large effects on positive meaning in life straight after treatment and at follow-up, and moderate effects on anxiety and depression and on self-efficacy. Experiential-existential and cognitive-existential approaches showed no significant effects in the small number of trials available. The authors described the studies as few and of low quality.

This approach suits people whose question is not symptomatic: a diagnosis that changed the horizon, a bereavement, retirement, a choice with no good option, a life that works on paper and feels unlived. It is a poor first choice for conditions where better-tested treatments exist and act faster, among them obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, bipolar disorder and psychosis. Two misreadings are worth naming. It is not pessimism dressed up, since the point of facing the givens is to live more deliberately, not less. And it is not a substitute for treatment when symptoms are severe: if emptiness has turned into persistent low mood or a loss of interest, see a licensed professional rather than sitting with the question alone.

Reviewed by Michael Callans, MSW
Checked the four givens and the session description against Yalom's own text, the lineage against the 1958 Existence collection, and every effect-size claim against the 2015 meta-analysis, including which branches showed no significant effect.

References

1. Yalom ID. Existential Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books; 1980.
2. Yalom ID. Staring at the Sun: Overcoming the Terror of Death. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
3. May R, Angel E, Ellenberger HF, eds. Existence: A New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology. New York: Basic Books; 1958.
4. van Deurzen E. Everyday Mysteries: A Handbook of Existential Psychotherapy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2010.
5. Vos J, Craig M, Cooper M. Existential therapies: a meta-analysis of their effects on psychological outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(1):115-128. doi:10.1037/a0037167
6. Frankl VE. Man's Search for Meaning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 2006 (first published 1946).

Existential Therapy FAQ