Our Editorial Board

The named experts behind our content. Every subject area on Psychology.com is overseen by a credentialed member of our Editorial Board, so you always know who is responsible for what you read.

Our Editorial Board exists for one reason: so that the mental health information you find here can be trusted. People often arrive at Psychology.com during a hard moment, trying to make sense of what they or someone they love is going through. That deserves content that is accurate, current, and genuinely human, and it deserves a real person, with real credentials, standing behind it.

The board is made up of credentialed experts, including PhDs, PsyDs, MDs, and licensed clinicians. These are the named reviewers responsible for our content. Each subject area is assigned to a board member who is the named reviewer for that area and who oversees it on an ongoing basis, reading the pages, flagging corrections, and adding clinical nuance over time. Their name, credentials, and the scope of their role are public on every profile.

We are honest about our size. The board is small today and growing deliberately. We would rather have a handful of experts who genuinely own their sections than a long list of names lending their credentials to pages they have never read. Below you can see who our current members are, exactly how our content is made, how we vet the people who review it, and how much of the site their oversight now covers.

How our content is reviewed

Every page moves through the same process before it goes live and stays under review after it publishes. This is a short version. For the full detail, read our editorial process.

  1. Written to documented standards

    Each subject area has a written editorial standard that defines how a topic should be covered: what to include, which claims need a citation, the tone to use, and the lines we will not cross. Our writers work in plain language that respects the reader.

  2. Checked for accuracy against approved sources

    Before a page is published, an automated accuracy check compares its factual claims against an approved source list of peer-reviewed research, government health data, and professional bodies. Anything that cannot be matched to an approved source is flagged for a human to resolve.

  3. Reviewed and overseen by a credentialed board member

    A credentialed Editorial Board member is the named reviewer responsible for the section. They read the pages, flag corrections, add clinical nuance, and keep the content current over time. Where an expert has personally reviewed a specific page, we mark it "Reviewed" with the date, and we will not claim a personal review that did not happen.

What board members do, and how we vet them

A seat on the board is not honorary. Each member is the accountable reviewer for a defined subject area matched to their training and licensure, not a name attached to the whole site. Before anyone joins, we confirm the essentials.

Board members

The credentialed experts responsible for our content today. Each profile lists their background and the exact pages they oversee.

Our coverage, by the numbers

Expert oversight reaches across the site rather than sitting on a single "about" page. Our board members are the named reviewers for hundreds of pages spanning our tests, tools, guides, concepts, careers, degrees, and AI therapy sections. As the board grows, more sections move from our founding reviewer to a dedicated specialist.

Counts reflect the tests, tools, guides, concepts, careers, degrees, and AI therapy pages currently assigned to a named reviewer. We would rather report a number we can stand behind than inflate one.

Our sourcing and standards

Claims about mental health should rest on solid ground. Our approved source list is built from three kinds of evidence, and a factual claim does not ship until it can be tied to one of them.

Corrections. We get things wrong sometimes, and when we do we fix them quickly and openly. If you spot an error, email hello@psychology.com and tell us what looks off. We review every message, correct confirmed errors, update the page, and note when a change is significant.
Join our Editorial Board. We are actively expanding the board and welcome licensed clinicians, PhDs, PsyDs, and MDs who want to own a subject area and put their name behind content that helps people. If that is you, we would love to talk.
Get in touch
A note on scope. Our content is reviewed for accuracy and is for education only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, and reading it does not create a provider relationship. If you are in crisis, call or text 988 (US) any time, or contact your local emergency services.