Adlerian Therapy: Adler's Individual Psychology in Practice
Adlerian therapy is the approach built from Alfred Adler's individual psychology, which treats a person as a whole moving toward goals they have usually never put into words. This guide covers social interest, inferiority and compensation, lifestyle and early recollections, the four phases of the work, the techniques a therapist actually uses, and an honest account of the evidence, including what large studies found about birth order.
Reviewed byMichael Callans, MSWKey terms in Adlerian therapy
The four phases of the work
1. Relationship
A deliberately equal alliance: goals agreed rather than assigned, the therapist's authority played down, and no interpretation offered before there is enough trust to argue with it.
2. Assessment
Family constellation, early recollections and an account of the three life tasks of work, friendship and love. The aim is a picture of the lifestyle, including where the person is quietly avoiding.
3. Insight
The private goal made visible, offered as a guess rather than a verdict: could it be that staying angry keeps you from having to try? A hypothesis the person is free to reject is one they can actually test.
4. Reorientation
Where change happens. New behavior tried in small deliberate doses, convictions revised against what happens, and encouragement used to hold the effort in place while the results are still thin.
An early recollections sheet (about 25 minutes)
- Write three memories from your earliest years, as early as you can reach. Each one must be a single scene you can see rather than a general period: not we always went to the lake, but the afternoon the boat came back without me on it.
- For each memory, write it in the present tense in four or five sentences. Who is there, what happens, what you do, and the one moment that stands out most clearly.
- Under each, write the feeling in one or two words, and then what you concluded without being told: about yourself, about other people, and about what life requires of you.
- Now read the three together and look for the repeated shape rather than the content. Is someone always watching? Are you always the one who notices the danger first, or the one left out, or the one who fixes it?
- Write that shape as a sentence beginning with the words I am safe when. This is the conviction, in your own words, and it will usually feel obvious rather than insightful.
- Finish with the test: name one situation this week where that conviction will show up, and one thing you could do differently there as an experiment. Accuracy of the memories does not matter here; what you still do with them does.
Techniques an Adlerian therapist uses
- Encouragement: naming effort, choice and contribution instead of praising results, so that worth stops depending on performance.
- The question: what would be different in your life if this problem were gone? Used to find what the symptom is protecting or providing.
- Acting as if: behaving for a defined period as though the missing quality were already there, treated as an experiment with a report back rather than as advice.
- Catching oneself: learning to notice the moment just before the old pattern fires, which is the only point at which anything else is possible.
- Pushing the button: deliberately bringing up a pleasant memory, then a bitter one, to demonstrate that the feeling follows the attention rather than arriving unbidden.
- Spitting in the soup, Adler's blunt phrase for naming the payoff of a behavior out loud, so it can still be chosen but no longer enjoyed in the same way.
- Task setting and homework: small agreed actions between sessions, kept small enough that the point is the attempt rather than the outcome.
- Interpretation as a guess, always tentative and always open to rejection, because a conviction can only be revised by the person holding it.
Birth order: what the research actually found
Adler proposed that psychological position among siblings shapes the strategy a person builds: the eldest displaced by an arrival, the second measuring against a pacesetter, the youngest indulged and underestimated, the only one at home among adults. He was more careful than his popularizers, insisting that the position as experienced mattered more than the order of birth.
The modern evidence does not support the personality claim. In 2015 Julia Rohrer, Boris Egloff and Stefan Schmukle analyzed more than 20,000 adults in German, American and British panel studies, comparing siblings both within families and across them, with enough statistical power to detect very small effects. They found no birth-order effect on the broad personality traits, a small decline in psychometric intelligence from first to later born, and a drop of roughly a tenth of a standard deviation in self-rated intellect that persisted after controlling for measured ability.
So the family constellation remains useful as a question, which is how Adler used it: who had which role, who gave up what, who was compared with whom. As a prediction about personality it has not held up, and a therapist who tells you what you are like from your position among siblings is reading a chart rather than listening.
What the evidence shows
Adlerian therapy has a thin outcome literature, and the clearest evidence of that is the discussion inside the field itself: Len Sperry devoted a 2018 paper in the Journal of Individual Psychology to why the approach needs evidence-based status and how it might get there, and colleagues replied in the same issue debating whether that is even the right target. Randomized trials of Adlerian individual therapy with adults are few, and nothing approaches the evidence behind cognitive behavioral therapy for a specific diagnosis.
Two things are fair to say alongside that. Parent education programs derived from this tradition, including Systematic Training for Effective Parenting, have been studied more often than the individual therapy, though we have not reviewed those trials and make no claim about their strength. And several Adlerian principles have been absorbed into mainstream practice and tested there: a collaborative therapeutic relationship, goals set with the person, attention to what a behavior accomplishes, and encouragement rather than praise. Treat Adlerian therapy as a coherent and humane framework with a weak outcome base, not as a proven treatment.
What Adlerian therapy is not
It is not a birth order reading. The family constellation is a set of questions about role, comparison and position, and the research on position as a predictor of personality is close to null.
It is not a way of blaming a family for how a life turned out. The whole weight of the theory sits on the interpretation a person made of their early situation, which is also why revision is possible: the events are fixed and the conclusion is not.
It is not advice, even though Adlerians are direct. An interpretation handed over as a certainty cannot be examined, and the technique requires it to be offered as a guess. And it is not a first-line treatment for a specific condition. Where panic, obsessive compulsive disorder, trauma or a depressive episode is the problem, the treatment with the evidence comes first, and this framework is useful for the questions that remain once symptoms ease: where you belong, what you contribute, and what you long ago decided you were not allowed to need.
Related tools & tests
Want a therapist who works with you as an equal?
Search licensed therapists and ask about collaboration, goals and the approach they use. Free to search our directory.
About this tool
Adlerian therapy is a form of psychotherapy based on the individual psychology of Alfred Adler (1870 to 1937), a Viennese physician who worked alongside Freud and then broke with him. Individual psychology is a confusing name in English: Adler's word meant indivisible, and his argument was that a person cannot be split into competing parts and drives but has to be understood as one whole moving in a direction. The practical consequence is that an Adlerian therapist asks what a symptom is for rather than only where it came from, and treats behavior as goal-directed even when the person would not recognize the goal if it were named.
Adler's break with Freud became public at the 1911 Weimar congress; he left the Vienna circle, and the group he formed became the Society for Individual Psychology in 1912. The differences were substantive. Where Freud put sexuality and unconscious conflict at the center, Adler put the social situation: a person's place among others, their sense of standing in it, and what they do about it. He worked in public clinics and guidance centers in Vienna through the 1920s, writing for ordinary readers and training teachers, until the Austrian government closed the clinics in the 1930s. He died in Aberdeen in 1937 while on a lecture tour.
The engine of the theory is inferiority and compensation. Adler held that everyone begins small and dependent, that feeling less than is therefore universal rather than pathological, and that the movement from felt minus to felt plus drives most of what people do. Healthy compensation builds real competence and contributes to others. Trouble shows up in two directions: an inferiority complex, where the gap feels unbridgeable and the person withdraws or hides behind excuses, and a superiority complex, where the same gap is covered by contempt, boasting or control. Adler read both as a solution the person arrived at, which is why he treated discouragement, rather than illness, as the central clinical problem.
The second key idea is social interest, Adler's Gemeinschaftsgefühl, which translators have rendered as community feeling, social feeling and social interest. It means a felt connection to other people, expressed as cooperation and willingness to contribute, and Adler treated it as both the measure of mental health and the aim of therapy. He placed it against the useless side of life: striving that serves only personal prestige. He also described three life tasks that no one escapes, work, friendship and love, with later Adlerians adding how a person relates to themselves and to questions of meaning. Where someone is avoiding is usually clearer than what they say is wrong.
Lifestyle, in Adler's sense, is not interior decoration or diet. It is the whole plan a person worked out early in life for how to belong and be safe, running as a set of convictions about themselves, other people and what is required: convictions so early that they feel like facts rather than opinions. Adlerians look for the fictional final goal that organizes it, the imagined endpoint the person moves toward as if it were real, and for the basic mistakes inside it: overgeneralizations, impossible standards, mistaken ideas about what life demands. The point of making a lifestyle explicit is that a conviction you can see is one you can revise, and one you cannot see simply runs.
Read the diagram as text
A person stands at the left of a fine rail with three posts standing on it: work, friendship and love. An accented line runs along the rail past the first two posts, then lifts away before the third and climbs toward a ring drawn as a dashed accented outline above and to the right, a goal the person has never put into words. The third post is left untouched. The accent is the movement itself: the line is organized by the unnamed goal, which is why one of the tasks gets avoided.
Lifestyle, the fictional final goal and the three life tasks
Conceptual sequence, not an outcome
The early situation: Everyone begins small and dependent, so feeling less than is ordinary rather than pathological
The plan worked out early: Convictions about yourself, other people and what is required, formed so early that they feel like facts
A goal never put into words: The imagined endpoint the person moves toward as if it were real
Work, friendship and love: The three life tasks nobody escapes, where the movement becomes visible
The task that gets avoided: Where someone is avoiding is usually clearer than what they say is wrong
Named, it can be revised: A conviction you can see is one you can examine; one you cannot see simply runs
The early situation → a child works out how to belong and be safe → The plan worked out early
The plan worked out early → and the plan is organized by an imagined endpoint → A goal never put into words
A goal never put into words → the movement shows at work, friendship and love → Work, friendship and love
A goal never put into words → the line lifts away from the task the goal cannot risk → The task that gets avoided (error transition)
Early recollections are Adler's signature assessment method. A therapist asks for several specific memories from the earliest years, each told as a single scene with a clear moment and the feeling attached to it, and treats what the person remembers as a selection rather than a record. Adler's argument was that out of thousands of forgotten episodes, we keep the handful that fit the outlook we are using now, which makes early recollections a picture of present convictions rather than an archive of events. Their accuracy is beside the point, and so is any claim that they prove what happened. Research on their reliability as a formal instrument is limited, and they are best used as a conversation starter and a hypothesis, which is how Adlerian clinicians such as Arthur Clark describe them.
Birth order is the part of Adler's work that reached the public, and the part the evidence has not been kind to. Adler proposed that the position a person occupies among siblings shapes the strategy they develop: the eldest dethroned by an arrival, the second always measuring against a pacesetter, the youngest both indulged and underestimated, the only one at ease among adults. He was careful to say that psychological position mattered more than order of birth. Large modern studies have nonetheless found very little. Julia Rohrer, Boris Egloff and Stefan Schmukle, working in 2015 with more than 20,000 adults in German, American and British panel data, found no effect of birth order on the broad personality traits, a small decline in measured intelligence from first to later born, and a small drop in self-rated intellect that survived controlling for test performance.
The work itself is usually described in four phases, a structure formalized by Rudolf Dreikurs. The first is the relationship: a deliberately egalitarian alliance, with the chairs the same height and the goals agreed rather than assigned. The second is assessment, which gathers the family constellation, early recollections and the person's account of the three life tasks. The third is insight: interpretations offered as hypotheses, in the form of a guess the person is free to reject, aimed at making the private goal visible. The fourth is reorientation, where the actual change happens, and where the therapist's main instrument is encouragement.
Encouragement in this tradition is a technical term, not a warm manner, and Adlerians distinguish it sharply from praise. Praise rewards a result and ties worth to performance, which feeds the comparison the person is already losing. Encouragement names effort, choice and contribution, and it points at what the person did rather than what they are. The other named techniques are brisk and recognizable: acting as if, where someone behaves for a week as though they already had the quality they lack; catching oneself, which builds the pause between pattern and action; pushing the button, which demonstrates that dwelling on a memory produces the feeling that follows it; and the question, Adler's prompt asking what would be different in your life if this problem were gone, whose answer usually reveals what the symptom is protecting.
On evidence, Adlerian therapy is thinly studied and its own community says so. Len Sperry's 2018 paper in the Journal of Individual Psychology is titled around what it would take to achieve evidence-based status for the approach, and several colleagues replied in the same issue arguing about whether that goal is the right one. There are few randomized controlled trials of Adlerian individual therapy with adults, and nothing like the volume of evidence behind cognitive behavioral therapy for a specific diagnosis. The parent education programs that grew out of this tradition, among them Systematic Training for Effective Parenting, have been trialed more often than the individual therapy, though we have not reviewed those trials here and make no claim about their size or quality.
In practice Adler's ideas are more influential than his brand. The therapeutic relationship as a collaboration between equals, goals agreed with the person rather than for them, encouragement over praise, interest in what a behavior achieves rather than only what caused it, the stance that discouragement rather than deficiency is the problem: all of this is now standard across approaches and came in good part from him. If you want a therapist who works this way, ask about collaboration and goals rather than hunting for the label. Related reading: Inner Child Work covers early convictions from a different tradition, and ACT Values Worksheet puts the contribution question into a modern exercise.
What Adlerian therapy is not: it is not a birth order reading, and a therapist who tells you what you are like because of your position among siblings has swapped a theory for a horoscope. It is not an account that blames a family for everything, since the whole point of lifestyle is the interpretation a person made rather than the events themselves. It is not advice-giving, despite the directness, because an interpretation offered as a certainty cannot be examined. And it is not a first-line treatment for a specific disorder: where a condition has a well-tested protocol, that protocol comes first, with this material as the frame around it.
References
- Ansbacher HL, Ansbacher RR, eds. The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler: A Systematic Presentation in Selections from His Writings. New York: Basic Books; 1956.
- Adler A. What Life Should Mean to You. Boston: Little, Brown; 1931.
- Dreikurs R. Fundamentals of Adlerian Psychology. Chicago: Alfred Adler Institute; 1953.
- Carlson J, Watts RE, Maniacci M. Adlerian Therapy: Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006.
- Clark AJ. Early Recollections: Theory and Practice in Counseling and Psychotherapy. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2002.
- Rohrer JM, Egloff B, Schmukle SC. Examining the effects of birth order on personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(46):14224-14229. doi:10.1073/pnas.1506451112
- Sperry L. Achieving evidence-based status for Adlerian therapy: why it is needed and how to accomplish it. Journal of Individual Psychology. 2018;74(3):247-263.
Cite this source
Psychology.com. (2026, November 6). Adlerian Therapy. Psychology.com. https://psychology.com/tools/adlerian-therapy
Adlerian Therapy FAQ
What is Adlerian therapy?
Adlerian therapy is a form of psychotherapy built on Alfred Adler's individual psychology, which treats a person as one whole moving toward a goal rather than a set of competing drives. The therapist works collaboratively, as an equal rather than an expert, and asks what a symptom accomplishes as well as where it came from. Assessment covers the family constellation, early memories and how someone is handling the tasks of work, friendship and love. Treatment aims at making the private goal visible and then at reorientation, with encouragement as the main instrument. Discouragement, rather than illness, is treated as the central problem.
What are the main Adlerian therapy techniques?
The techniques are brisk and recognizable. Encouragement names effort, choice and contribution instead of praising results. The question asks what would be different if the problem were gone, which usually reveals what the symptom provides. Acting as if has a person behave for a week as though they already had the quality they lack. Catching oneself builds the pause between pattern and action. Pushing the button shows that a feeling follows attention rather than arriving unbidden. Spitting in the soup names a behavior's payoff out loud. Early recollections and lifestyle assessment supply the picture all of this works from.
What is individual psychology in Adler's sense?
Individual psychology is Adler's name for his system, and the word individual is a translation trap. He meant indivisible: a person cannot be split into parts that fight each other, and has to be read as a single whole moving in one direction. That is the sharpest difference from the psychoanalysis he left behind in 1911. In practice it produces a therapy interested in purpose rather than only cause, in the social situation rather than only inner conflict, and in what someone is trying to achieve with a behavior that otherwise looks irrational. Adler founded the Society for Individual Psychology in 1912.
Does birth order really affect personality?
Largely no, and that is now one of the clearest findings against a popular idea. In 2015 Julia Rohrer, Boris Egloff and Stefan Schmukle examined more than 20,000 adults in German, American and British panel studies, comparing siblings within the same family and across different families, with the statistical power to catch very small effects. They found no birth-order effect on the broad personality traits. They did confirm a small decline in measured intelligence from first to later born, and a drop of about a tenth of a standard deviation in self-rated intellect. Adler's family constellation is still a useful question about role and comparison, but not a prediction about character.
Is Adlerian therapy evidence-based?
Not in the strict sense. There are few randomized controlled trials of Adlerian individual therapy with adults, and the field discusses this openly: Len Sperry published a paper in 2018 on what it would take to reach evidence-based status, and colleagues argued in the same issue about whether that is the right goal. Several Adlerian principles have fared better than the package, because they were absorbed into mainstream practice and tested there, including a collaborative relationship, agreed goals and encouragement rather than praise. For a specific disorder with a well-tested treatment, that treatment should be the spine of the work.
What are early recollections used for?
Early recollections are the Adlerian assessment method: several specific memories from the earliest years, each told as a single scene with the feeling attached. The therapist treats them as a selection rather than a record, on Adler's reasoning that out of thousands of forgotten episodes we keep the few that fit the outlook we are using now. So their accuracy is beside the point, and they prove nothing about what happened. What they offer is a picture of present convictions about self, others and what life requires. Research on their reliability as a formal instrument is limited, and careful clinicians use them as a hypothesis rather than a verdict.
What is the difference between Adlerian therapy and CBT?
They overlap more than their histories suggest. Both are active, present-focused, collaborative and interested in changing what someone does rather than only understanding it. The differences are emphasis: CBT works on specific thoughts and behaviors that maintain a problem, with a large evidence base per diagnosis, while Adlerian therapy works on the lifestyle underneath, meaning the early convictions about belonging and standing that organize many problems at once. Adlerian therapy also treats contribution and social connection as outcomes in their own right. Many therapists use CBT for the disorder and an Adlerian lens for the question of what a person is moving toward.